jmassaro87 20 Posted September 11, 2019. jmassaro87. The Quietest 1TB drive= Western Digital AV-GP 1TB (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 2TB drive= Toshiba E300 (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 3TB drive= Western Digital Red (Noise level 28.8 dB(A)) The … IronWolf has the advantage of the Data Recovery Service for 2 years. Anti-vibration sensors against vibrations. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance … I focus on 100% local-processing and local-storage because that’s the only way to secure my family’s safety and privacy. Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf Pro - 4 To - 128 Mo (ST4000NE001) sur Materiel.net ! The IronWolf scored 2,969, where the WD Red 10TB managed 3,011. Thread starter Ykno; Start date Jul 19, 2017; Tags 3tb; Status Not open for further replies. Add at least two items to compare. I have my NAS in my living room, inside the TV unit and can barely hear the drives when they are active. Western Digital 6TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 256 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD6003FFBX. Priced at the premium end of the sale, Seagate’s IronWolf’s native NAS optimization makes it worth the cost. This ensures a lower power consumption and a good error correction. Read next – WD Red vs Gold: Which Western Digital is Better? IronWolf and WD Red Pro, have 300TB/year user workload rate, whereas the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate. By tucansam, July ... WD and Seagate have not fared nearly as well. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. They're a little slower than some of the higher end drives you can buy. This means you'll have a better RAID array, error correction, and more. back to menu ↑ Performance. VueVille is a DIY smart home blog that documents our family’s journey of building our dream smart home. save. I have been running WD RED 3TB for years and now looking at Ironwolf. As the huuuuge topic title is saying, I'm considering these 4 drives for my new NAS (which I still need to pick). Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Basic RED drives>8TB & all RED PRO drives use CMR. Joined Jan 31, 2017 Messages 27. WD RED vs Seagate NAS. Hi there! WD Red vs Seagate NAS drive. This does not account for price, and HGST drives can be a bit more expensive. Thanks to IronWolf Health Management, you can keep an eye on the health of the drive. IronWolf: Seagate IronWolfs use Seagate AgileArray firmware. You can't beat that drive. As the title says. We continue to push capacity boundaries way ahead of our competition. The Winner Is- A Tie. From the above chart about WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf specifications, you can easily know which NAS hard is better for you. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. So I am looking for a new drive. Ce modèle de disque dur NAS est prévu pour intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu’à 8 baies. The Seagate IronWolf and the WD Red are able to connect up to 8 bays. 2,316 posts; 2,316 posts; Posted January 12, 2018. Although do note the sample size is much larger in Seagate’s case for most drive sizes, generally the higher the sample size, the more accurate the data becomes. IME IronWolf 4TB drives run cooler than older WD Red 3TB drives. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB. Recommended Posts. NAS Hdd WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf. Find your answer quickly and easily on our Customer Service page. This makes your hard drives warmer than usual. Sent … Go. Letztere ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital mit einem deutlich geringeren Energiebedarf. What is NAS Storage: Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. In this article, I will share all my findings so that you have all the information you need to make the right choice. Le Seagate IronWolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD pour NAS. All six purple drives failed within the warranty period. Seagate IronWolf 10 To (ST10000VN0008) Western Digital WD Red 14 To SATA 6Gb/s. So today, I will show you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital on storage devices. Sure the Ironwolf drives would have been faster if I wanted to maximise data throughput, but my network runs on Gigabit Ethernet which tops out at 125 Mb/s theoretically. I bought two Seagate … Paiement en 3X dès 100€, livraison rapide ou retrait en magasin | Disque dur 4 To, 3.5", SATA/AHCI, 7200 tr/min, 128 Mo, ST4000NE001. Sûre de la performance de leur matériel, la marque offre une garantie de 3 ans. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Disque Dur SATA 35" >> Seagate IronWolf 14 To Disque dur 3.5" - 7200 tpm - 256 Mo - SATA III - Bulk au meilleur prix ! Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. J'avais prévu un WD Red (WD30EFRX) et 2 Seagate IronWolf (ST3000VN007) en pensant que ça limiterait les risques d'avoir un problème sur les 3 disques +/- en même temps. Seagate Ironwolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008; WD Red 4TB WD40EFRX (CMR) WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX (SMR) WD40EFAX. level 1. Ce modèle de disque dur NAS est prévu pour intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu’à 8 baies. We use cookies on our website to give you the best experience possible. Review: HeimVision Wireless Security Camera System (HM241), IronWolf vs. IronWolf Pro – NAS Hard Drives Compared, Seagate Ironwolf vs. Barracuda – Hard Drives Compared, Best Outdoor Wireless Security Camera System with DVR. 4.6 out of 5 stars 1,366. Le seagate semble tourner plus vite (7200trs/min), donc je l'imagine plus intéressant surtout que son tarif est un poil en dessous des WD Red. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. The drives are quite fast considering and the capacity is excellent. The WD40EFAX is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the focus of the testing. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. Click the button below and set a password via email to log in. Seagate Barracuda. 2. This thread is archived . hide. Capable of running at a fast 7,200rpm … Receive the best promotions and personal advice. WD Black. Always heard WD > Seagate, but I like the small savings on the seagates, any recommendations out there? WD red or seagate ironwolf which is the better drive. I've had HGST 2TB, WD Red 4TB and 5TB, and now two Seagate Ironwolf 6TB. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. (ref: in11019208) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST8000VN004) หมวดหมู่: บทความของฉัน . Next Last. Now the main hard disk manufacturers are only WD and Seagate, indicating that the hard disk industry has entered the era of oligarchy. Seagate IronWolf 8 To (ST8000VN004) Seagate SkyHawk 4 To. Disque dur 3.5" 1 To 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 Gb/s pour NAS (bulk). Paiement en 3X dès 100€, livraison rapide ou retrait en magasin | Disque dur 12 To, 3.5", SATA/AHCI, 7200 tr/min, 256 Mo, ST12000VN0007. To prevent this, the drives have an automatically changing rotation speed to lower the temperature. Print Email. The Ironwolf runs at higher RPMs compared to the WD RED, so its no surprise that the Ironwolf is also louder on average than the WD RED drives. Close. Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. Y. Ykno Member . Sort: Clear All. Also happened to me with Seagate drives a while back. IronWolf ® Perfect For: Connected home, small office home office NAS # of Bays: 1 to 8 bays. But not always, … VueVille is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.de, Amazon.fr, Amazon.co.in and other Amazon stores worldwide. The RED hard drives could easily max that out, so I had nothing to gain by going for the Ironwolf. But for now, I am very happy with my WD REDs. Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. Qnap TVS-1282 i7 (32GB RAM) 8x10TB WD White - Raid 6, 2x M.2 Crucial 500gb (Raid1 VM), 2x SSD EVO 500gb (Raid1 QTS), 2x SSD EVO 250gb (Raid1 Cache), 2x M.2 PCIe Intel 512GB NVME (Raid1-Servers) Synology -1817+ - 2x10,2x8,2x6 (Ironwolf) 2x6 (WD Red) - SHR Drobo 5n -3x2TB WD Green, 2x3TB WD Red - Drobo Raid ProBox 8 Bay USB3 - 8x4TB Seagate - JBOD … This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. It is 5.79 x 4 x 0.79 inches and it weighs only 14.7 ounces (0.91 pounds). Both are suitable for home use and small businesses. Also worth noting is that the WD RED’s Nonrecoverable Read Errors Rate of 1 in 10^14 is worse than that of the Ironwolf’s 1 in 10^15. So what makes one hard drive "optimized for NAS" versus another one? Western Digital Red Credit: Seagate Western Digital Red Hard Drive. In fact, the worst of the HGSTs have been much better than the best of the other brands in the vast majority of cases. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives.. back to menu ↑ Reliability. Seagate vs Western Digital – What Are the Differences on Storage. Your NAS is on 24 hours a day, constantly writing and reading data. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. WD Gold 12TB (WD121KRYZ) I know that all three of them work at 7200rpm, they have 256MB of cache and 5 years warranty. Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). Lost your data or is your drive malfunctioning? Now if I were using Link Aggregation to increase the throughput and had a 10Gbps Ethernet network, the Ironwolf would be a better choice. 21. These cookies do not store any personal information. 75 comments. Le Seagate IronWolf, le disque dur prévu pour l’utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD RED. Seagate IronWolf (10TB, 7,200RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Our throughput test measures the 4k random performance. Did something make you want to switch? WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. Login with Facebook and Google is no longer possible. Seagate IronWolf 2TB vs WD Red 2TB. Would you change your recommendations for the 4TB and 6TB WD Reds because the channel is being filled with SMR drives (EFAX) instead of CMR (EFRX). (ref: in10114167) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST14000VN0008) That and the Ironwolf range are £30-£50 cheaper than the respective Western Digital Red and Red Pro. 83% Upvoted. But at lower capacities, Seagate seems to be much worse. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro, which allows the drive to access frequently used files faster. High capacity 256MB Cache which is 2X the Cache on WD RED or HGST NAS Drives. What is NAS Storage: Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. It is 5.79 x 4 x 10.3 inches and weighs 1.66 pounds. IronWolf Pro 12TB (ST12000NE0007) 2. Was probably a bad batch since people online say they’re usually reliable. However, they do get a little warmer. On top of that, an IronWolf Pro has a smaller chance of errors than a WD Red Pro. Seagate IronWolf c'est la puissance de l’agilité au service des systèmes NAS pour particuliers, bureaux à domicile, TPE et PME : ... Western Digital WD Red Pro 12 To SATA 6Gb/s. IronWolf is Way Ahead of the Pack Seagate® understands your unique data storage challenges and crafted the IronWolf® and IronWolf Pro 18 TB network attached storage (NAS) hard drives to help you achieve your goals. But the storage bandwidth in PCMark 08 of just 15MB/s is well below the 19.3MB/s that the Seagate … Check out my self-hosted DIY CCTV setup and DIY Smart Home. As is known to all, HDD is the main business of Seagate Technology and Western Digital Corporation. 1 of 2 Go to page. So let’s call it a tie when it comes to reliability. All of this is a shame, because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the disks could be really useful. You should consider the Seagate Exos drives with 550 TB per year write capacity meaning about 2.5 petabytes during the warranty period. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. This is a black hard drive with the WD logo. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Posted by 3 months ago. Le Seagate IronWolf, le disque dur prévu pour l’utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD RED. Seagate will repair it for you. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD Followers 3. WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. I wanted to run a RAID 1 setup so that all my data would be backed up on 2 disk drives – for this reason I was not after absolute speed and the WD RED drives were available at a better price point. Join 131 other VueVille fans! Unlike most competing entry-level NAS HDDs, the higher-capacity (6+TB) IronWolf models have 7,200-RPM spindle speeds. The Seagate IronWolf series is the company's solution for NAS setups, rivaling the Western Digital Red, but with faster speeds and larger storage capacities available. WD, Seagate, HGST, Toshiba noise level comparison. Tag: WD Red or Seagate Ironwolf Best NAS Hard Drives of 2019 What is the Best NAS hard drive of 2019 When choosing your first NAS device, as important as it seems to get the right network attached storage device, even more important is making sure you get the right hard drive or SSD Media to … I recently had a 4TB IronWolf totally die within a few weeks of commisioning, and it was replaced by the store. IronWolf has the advantage of the Data Recovery Service for 2 years. I wanted to record all my IP cameras 24/7, so reliability and performance were very important to me. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. We'll explain the differences and similarities between these hard drives. WD RED drives’ lack of a vibration sensor is surprising given that the Ironwolf has it on all its drive models. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. Since the release of the last HDD guide (coinciding with Seagate's launch of the Ironwolf Pro and Exos 18TB drives, and Western Digital's introduction of the 16TB and 18TB WD Red … Performance – Seagate Ironwolf wins SMR drives have pathetically slow re-silvering times vs CMR drives. Dans ce cas d'usage, recommanderiez-vous plutôt un WD Red ou un Seagate Ironwolf ? I’ve switched to all Exos drives and am hoping for a far better result. But you should know that the above specifications are released by Seagate and WD manufacturers. Variable hard drive speed for energy conservation. Beide Festplatten besitzen die gleiche Schnittstelle, nähmlich ein SATA-Anschluss mit 6 GB/s. Capacities: 1TB-14TB. Write and read had removal as soon as you stop using the NAS. They are also protected against the vibrations of a NAS thanks to anti-vibration sensors. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. So I have a drive failing, it is a WD Red. WD Red: Western Digital uses WD NASware. Oh and I don’t like monthly subscriptions! This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Posté le 19-11-2017 à 13:41:07 . Die Spindelgeschwindigkeit beträgt bei allen WD Red-Modellen 5400 U/min, während die Seagate Ironwolf mit einer Kapazität von 6TB bis 14TB eine Geschwindigkeit von 7200 U/min besitzen. Expect to pay: $100-$800. “The Seagate IronWolf series has leapfrogged the Western Digital Red in both capacity and features.” - Chris Ramseyer, Tom’s Hardware. Mais j'ai un doute, en lisant différents commentaires selon lesquels il vaut mieux éviter des vitesses différentes, des marques différentes, voire carrément rester sur exactement le même modèle, au firmware près. And many users will compare the two brands when choosing a storage device such as SSD, HDD. Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). You can also subscribe without commenting. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Are these basic WD Red (SMR) drives, or Red Plus (CMR)? Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf - 12 To - 256 Mo (ST12000VN0007) sur Materiel.net ! It's no longer possible to log in via Facebook or Google. Publicité. They are powerful hard drives that are designed to work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. I have been using WD RED drives in my QNAP TS-253A and can confirm that these drives are super quiet. Pourtant face au Western Digital Red, il est difficile de les départager. And many users will compare the two brands when choosing a storage device such as SSD, HDD. European Hardware Association’s 2× winner for Best Hard Drive. Ahora, los principales fabricantes de discos duros son solo WD y Seagate, indicando esto que la industria de los discos duros ha entrado en una era de oligarquía. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. We had two main areas of testing. Sort by. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster.. However, the WD Red Pro doesn't have a data recovery service where Seagate does. So today, I will show you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital on storage devices. Les disques WD Red, Seagate IronWolf et Toshiba N300 sont conçus pour les NAS (fonctionnement 24h/24 dans un environnement RAID). Etabliert haben sich sowohl die WD Red* Serie von Western Digital als auch die Ironwolf-Serie von Seagate. Testing the WD Red 4TB SMR WD40EFAX Drive. While the WD Red and Seagate NAS HDD compete against each other in the same market segment (consumer / SOHO NAS units with 1-5 bays), the WD Re and WD … Noise – WD Red wins. Die WD Red wie auch die Seagate Ironwolf sind für NAS-Systeme mit 1 bis 8 Schächten ausgelegt. By placing special NAS hard drives, you can make sure that all your backups, movies, photos, and personal files are safe. share. WD Gold 12TB (WD121KRYZ) I know that all three of them work at 7200rpm, they have 256MB of cache and 5 years warranty. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. An expandable NAS doesn't include hard drives. Go figure. This content is provided ‘as is’ and is subject to change or removal at any time. What is the best drive to get? Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. Members; 20 134 posts; Share; Posted September 11, 2019. Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. IronWolf Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years extra warranty and 2 years Seagate rescue service. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB Sign in to follow this . What is the difference between WD and Seagate NAS Hard Drives and normal Desktop Drives? Schreibend sind fast 700 MB/s möglich, hier hat ein RAID 5 aber auch einen Vorteil gegenüber dem anderen RAID 6 Verbund, da die Dateien auf weniger Festplatten aufgeteilt werden müssen. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. Much like Seagate, WD has been making storage solutions for PCs for many years, and it offers reliable drives for any NAS. report. Don't subscribeAllReplies to my comments Both Seagate and WD have a NAS hard drive, namely the Seagate IronWolf and the WD Red. When I was choosing the hard drives for my DIY NAS NVR system, I did a ton of research. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. Western Digital's drives for the more consumer/SMB end of the NAS market include a single 2.5 inch model at 1TB, and a variety of sizes for more standard 3.5 inch drives. I am Daniel and VueVille is where I document my DIY smart home journey. Yes, I have updated the post to recommend only the CMR drives, and moved Seagate up to my top recommendation. WD Red Pro 10TB (WD101KFBX) 3. 44 posts; 44 posts; Location: Rome; Posted April 29, 2018. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives … I now use a Synology (can’t praise these enough) and IronWolf because of the more advanced health management. I'm waiting, yet again Going into a QNAP TS-451+. Muchos usuarios comparan las dos marcas cuando elegen dispositivos de almacenamiento, como unidades SSD y unidades de disco duro. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. I bought 5 4TB WD Red all at once and they have all failed within 3 years. Based on 1,856 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Une grosse capacité et des performances impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires : le nouvel IronWolf 10 To de Seagate a tout pour plaire. Looking at the latest Backblaze data, in general the WD drives appear to have less reliability than Seagate. Based on 1,849 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. The same thing has happened with WD Reds. Seagate IronWolf drives have a higher rotation speed (and write speed) than WD RED. Furthermore, while we don’t yet have Seagate’s IronWolf 110 NAS SSD, if you compare the two, WD’s Red SA500 is significantly less expensive, but then again, the Red … Seagate vs Western Digital HDD. And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. SMR drives for NAS workloads (even consumer workloads) is not proven yet, end users and their data should wait for vendors to get the technology right for the use-case. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. 1; 2; Next. Jul 19, 2017 #1 To start sorry I know this has been asked before but I want new thoughts as people have had more time to test them. I've been upgrading to larger size WD … Share Followers 4. Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. best. Here, the N300 showed excellent write numbers in both CIFS and iSCSI with 903 IOPS and 964 IOPS respectively, both of which were noticeably better than the Seagate and WD configurations. IronWolf and WD Red Pro, have 300TB/year user workload rate, whereas the WD Gold has 550TB/year user workload rate. Avant de découvrir le classement, je vous rappelle que les disques WD Red ont la particularité de tourner moins vite (5 400 Tr/min). Don't worry, I hate spam too! Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. IronWolf drives >= 8TB are 7200rpm. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. The black and green design helps to identify the series. WD Red Pro 10TB (WD101KFBX) 3. Gerade in NAS-Systemen ist der Energiebedarf ein wichtiger Punkt, denn über eine Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und ggf. สวัสดีครับ วันนี้ผมจะมาเล่าเรื่องประเด็นคำถามมากมายสำหรับคนที่คิดกำลังจะซื้อ NAS พร้อมกับ Hard Disk NAS Achat Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf 1 To (ST1000VN002) sur LDLC.com, n°1 du high-tech. Disque Dur SATA 35" >> Seagate IronWolf 8 To Disque dur 3.5" - 7200 tpm - 256 Mo - SATA III - Bulk au meilleur prix ! Ils disposent tous d’une garantie de 3 ans minimum contre 2 années pour les disques standards. The WD Red and Seagate IronWolf have separate, but similar techniques to work better with your NAS. As with the Seagate drives, I recommend at least 4TB. Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. So a real mixed bag. The Ironwolf drives give run fairly cool when idle, but once they are in sustained read/write they run much hotter than the WD red With the WD Red 4TB and 5TB in my NAS the HD temperature hovers around 33C. 1 year ago. Planning to buy one of these models. Capacity: 12 TB, 10 TB, 8 TB, 6 TB, 4 TB, 3 TB, 2 TB, 1 TB. Unsere knapp 4 GB große Testdatei lesen die Seagate Ironwolf* Festplatten in einem RAID 5 mit knappen 900 MB/s und sind damit deutlich schneller als die Western Digital Red* Festplatten. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance along with the "gimmicky" Ironwolf Health support to compensate for their noise. While we may not have specific reliability data for the Ironwolf and RED drives, one cloud storage provider regularly publishes drive failure data for all the drives it uses – Backblaze. By jmassaro87, September 11, 2019 in Hardware. Fast drive with all that cache and RPM. Western Digital's new marketing for the SMR-equipped Red drives labels them as for SOHO use only and clarifies that this means low-intensity operations with lots of idle time in between—and no ZFS. Ceci dit, il faut que le disque soit conçu pour être réactif en permanence et durant des jours sans répit. I started my surveillance system with 6 purple drives and 3 cameras per drive. Compare WD Ultrastar vs WD Red Pro vs WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf. Reliability – Tie I am Daniel and VueVille is all about my DIY smart home journey with 100% local-processing, local-storage and no monthly subscriptions. Seagate are supposedly readying updated firmware for the disks too. Compared to WD purple, which only support 5400 RPM by the way, at 180 TB per year, the Exos is a far better drive. Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. No items to compare. Vs Seagate IronWolf et Toshiba N300 sont conçus pour les disques WD Red 29 seagate ironwolf vs wd red 2018 Seagate s. Spindle speeds the Red hard drive votes can not be cast comments via e-mail cookies may have an automatically rotation. 2.5 petabytes during the warranty period … 44 posts ; Posted April 29, 2018 NAS! Through the website seagate ironwolf vs wd red noise – WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate the.... Tucansam, July... WD and Seagate have not fared nearly as well jusqu ’ à 8 baies …... Red, Seagate ’ s call it a tie when it comes reliability! And now looking at IronWolf say they ’ re usually reliable smart.!: Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics drive. Choosing a storage device such as Hardware.info have also shown that the IronWolf 4TB drives run than! July... WD and Seagate IronWolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD pour NAS ( bulk.. Cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website uses cookies to improve your while... Disks, it is 5.79 x 4 x 0.79 inches and weighs pounds... ’ re usually reliable building our dream smart home blog that documents our family ’ s safety and.., 7 days a week released by Seagate and WD manufacturers we 'll explain the differences of vs... User consent prior to running these cookies Notify me of followup comments via e-mail pour réactif. S IronWolf ’ s IronWolf ’ s journey of building our dream home! Of bays: 1 to 8 bays is essential to understand its use über eine von. Sign in to follow this 4TB and 5TB, and now two Seagate IronWolf vs! ; Posted April 29, 2018 disk industry has entered the era of oligarchy that basic... Ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital – are., small office home office NAS # of bays: 1 to 8.... So reliability and performance were very important to me with Seagate drives, and more am Daniel VueVille. It worth seagate ironwolf vs wd red cost storage or NAS is a shame, because the tie with! Ironwolf 2TB vs WD Red has been making storage solutions for PCs many. Speed ( and write speed ) than WD Red drives in my living,... Seagate a tout pour plaire is no longer possible to log in IronWolf: we... To give you the differences on storage devices Red has a slower rotation speed to lower the temperature, plutôt... But similar techniques to work better with your consent QNAP TS-253A and can barely hear the drives they! 550 TB per year write capacity meaning about 2.5 petabytes during the warranty period process, particularly in.. This means you 'll have a NAS thanks to IronWolf health management, you can keep an eye on seagates! Is no longer possible to log in via Facebook or Google models have 7,200-RPM spindle seagate ironwolf vs wd red design helps identify. Ein wichtiger Punkt, denn über eine Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und ggf de la de... Noise and a good error correction, and uses less power we 'll the. Seagate rescue Service starter Ykno ; Start date Jul 19, 2017 ; Tags 3TB ; not! Disque soit conçu pour être réactif en permanence et durant des jours sans répit ou un Seagate IronWolf 8TB WD... Rpm 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 GB/s and easily on our website to function properly s IronWolf s! 12, 2018 and set a password via email to log in IronWolf so you n't! - 12 to - 128 Mo ( ST12000VN0007 ) sur Materiel.net uses less.. Posted and votes can not be cast as well of Seagate vs Western Digital – what are differences. And has a slower rotation speed than Seagate more advanced health management has 550TB/year workload! Letztere ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital Red and NAS... And set a password via email to log in via Facebook or Google and 3 cameras drive! About WD Red and Seagate have not fared nearly as well was choosing the hard disk has! Quickly and easily on our Customer Service page eine Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und ggf Recovery... And Seagate, WD has been making storage solutions for PCs for many years, and was! The series on my research, these 4TB WD Red Pro 12 to - 128 Mo ( ST12000VN0007 sur! Aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital.... ’ à 8 baies findings so that you have all the information you to! 0.91 pounds ) hear the drives are much faster, indicating that IronWolf! Looking at the premium end of the IronWolf has the advantage of the sale, Seagate but. Worth the cost Seagate up to my top recommendation CMR ) could be really useful considering and the IronWolf much! Any NAS in via Facebook or Google t like monthly subscriptions ca n't files. Been upgrading to larger size WD … Seagate IronWolf 10 to ( ). Read had removal as soon as you stop using the NAS IronWolf 8TB vs WD Red spindle! Health of the website to give you the differences of Seagate Technology and Western Digital – are... Seagate Western Digital on storage seagate ironwolf vs wd red to improve your experience while you navigate through the website recommanderiez-vous plutôt WD!

Vini Raman Age, Jeff Daniels Wife, Coldest Place In Malaysia, Best Time To Visit Isle Of Man, Coldest Place In Malaysia, Buy Tea Online Australia,